Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Blog Post #10: Specific Ethical Question

Ask/address an ethical question in your field of interest.
Develop/address arguments for each side of the issue then defend your position on the issue.


The following is in response of the assignment above:


Doctors deal with children every day, whether they are pediatricians or therapists they may have to face ethical decisions when they suspect that a child may be being abused.  My career plan is Physical Therapy so the field of interest for this ethical question includes Physical Therapy, but also includes medical practitioners everywhere in many different fields.  It is a doctor’s job to help their patients, but what if they think a child is being abused?  What is the responsibility of the doctor?  This is an ethical issue that has been talked about for a long time and there are opinions on if the doctor can/should tell somebody about it or not.  This is both an important and difficult ethical question.


There are people who think that the doctor should not tell anyone about the suspected child abuse.  It is against the law to break the confidentiality of the patient regardless if it is a child, teenage or adult.  They may think that the only relationship between the patient and practitioner is for the reason that the patient is there, not anything they might suspect.  According to an article written by LeRoy G. Schultz, “Confidentiality becomes of legal concern through legislative recognition and court precedent. Disclosure of confidential information could be the basis for professional discipline through an ethics complaint or legal action through civil or criminal liability.”  Breaking this confidentiality could get the doctor into a lot of trouble with the law.  If the guardians of the child speak for the child, and if they are the abusers legally they have the right to confidentiality.


On the other hand, there are people who believe that the doctor should tell someone, another worker or the authorities, about the suspected abuse.  Ethically it is right to tell someone about the abuse so it can stop and the child won’t be harmed anymore.  That responsibility is handed to the doctor once they believe the child is being abused because that abuse is wrong and against the law.  The American Academy of Pediatrics says in a journal article they wrote, “All states have laws that mandate reporting of suspected child abuse or neglect, and HIPAA rules allow disclosure of protected health information without legal guardian authorization under these circumstances.”  In other words, practitioners have the obligation to report their suspicion of abuse.  It is actually against the law to not disclose that information. 


I believe that it would be wrong not to disclose the suspicion of child abuse.  From my ethical standpoint, if someone is being hurt and you can stop it, you should.  There are laws in place that may protect you when you break the confidentiality and it is worth the risk to help that child.  It would be wrong to abuse the child in the first place, and suspecting it but not saying anything about is close to the same thing because you are letting that happen.  Of course you would have to have good reason and/or evidence that the abuse is happening, but if you confidently think it is happening, it should be dealt with.


Comittee on Child Abuse and Neglect. "Child Abuse, Confidentiality, and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act." Pediatrics. American Academy of Pediatrics, 2010. Web. 27 Oct. 2011. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/125/1/197.full.


Schultz, LeRoy G. "Confidentiality, Privilege, and Child Abuse Reporting." Institute for Psychological Therapies. IPT Journal, 1990. Web. 27 Oct. 2011. <http://www.ipt-forensics.com/journal/volume2/j2_4_5.htm>.

20 comments:

  1. 1. Strong
    2. Strong
    3. Strong
    4. Strong

    5. The quote talking about how all states have laws that mandate reporting of abuse is good. I was thinking maybe to strengthen that argument even more you could put some wording from one of those laws in as well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. S

    5. I might be ignorant, but I feel like this issue would be covered by law. Many of the confidentiality regulations in place for health care providers have certain excpets, and I believe child abuse would be included in them. Again, I could be ignorant to this, but I just feel like areas as delicate as child abuse would be covered in confidentiality reguations.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. Described field of interest and described question posed. Strong
    2. Both sides of argument were presented. Strong
    3. Appropriate references were included. Strong
    4. Defended position is described clearly. Strong

    5. You said that you would probably be protected if you were to break the patient confidentiality laws in the case of child abuse, it would be interesting if you could find an example of a company that does have a protective rule about that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1.S
    2.S
    3.S
    4.S

    5. You mentioned in one paragraph that it is illegal to break doctor-patient confidentiality no matter what, and then later said that it would be protected by law. I'm not sure it would even be implicitly illegal in the case of a child, but that's purely speculation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1.S
    2.S
    3.S
    4.S
    5. I believe the only thing that you could have done is maybe brought in some stats and numbers about the number of occurring suspected abuse cases from doctors. It'd be cool to see just how often this ethical situation is brought up and maybe the outcomes of investigation if leads to that. Otherwise very well done.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 1.S
    2.S
    3.S
    4.S
    5. I thought this was very well done and as the post above said, the only thing that could have made it better would be some stats.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kevin Kosel
    1.S
    2.S
    3.S
    4.S
    5.It would have been nice to see if you could find an article or law stating the “exceptions” to the doctor-patient confidentiality order in order to strengthen your argument.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 1.S
    2.S
    3.S
    4.S
    5. Like the content that you present. You bring up numerous times on the laws that restrict this and don't allow that, but where are these laws and who is enforcing them? Also what is the consequences for breaking the law?

    ReplyDelete
  9. 1.S
    2.S
    3.S
    4.S

    5. Good amount of detail on your topic. Is this a highly debated issue today? I just figured physicians are responsible for reporting abuse, who better to spot physical abuse?

    ReplyDelete
  10. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. S

    I like how in depth you are going into explaining this interesting topic. I think the only thing that may help you would be showing some statistics or charts on what this issue is doing for the medical community maybe.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 1.M
    2.S
    3.S
    4.S

    5.Good job on the post. In describing each side of the issue I would add a little more details, look for specific examples. Didn't really see where the field of interest was described, assumed that you are interested in becoming a doctor or related field some day.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 1. Described field of interest and described question posed: S
    2. Both sides of argument were presented: S
    3. Appropriate references were included: S
    4. Defended position is described clearly: S

    5. One Useful comment: Very detailed and informative. Is your related interest pediatrics? If so, it should have been stated at the beginning.

    ReplyDelete
  13. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. S
    5. Only thing I would do is see if you can find stats on to better back your argument

    ReplyDelete
  14. 1.s
    2.s
    3.s
    4very well done. stats would have been interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 1.S
    2.S
    3.S
    4.S

    5.You could develop your argument a little more, and some stats would have been interesting. You did a great job with both sides of the argument.

    ReplyDelete
  16. 1.S
    2.S
    3.S
    4.S

    Good defense of your opinion. I would ask for some examples of what would trigger you to alert people to possible abuse.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. S

    What is the actual occurrence of this?

    ReplyDelete
  18. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. S

    Interesting topic, obviously privacy is a very important in the medical field but I think you did a great job of pointing out a situation where privacy isn't the most important issue.

    ReplyDelete
  19. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. S
    5. Very thorough information. Some stats would have been cool to see. Well done.

    ReplyDelete
  20. 1. S
    2. S
    3. S
    4. S

    Nice job. I thought each side was welly represented. I would have like to see some stats however about how often this actually occurs.

    ReplyDelete